The unassailable alibi that the prosecution chose to ignore


At 10:46 am on February 22, 2014 Bank of America security footage recorded Dr. Frasch with his two children doing his banking in Panama City Beach. After that, he went on to his Panama City Beach home where his neighbour talked with him and helped him get his children out of their car seats. 

At the same time back in Tallahassee a woman matching Samira's description was seen alive on the driveway - putting something into the Hummer and returning to the house - by neighbours, Mr. Matthew Christiansen and his daughter, Lauren. Dr. Frasch was three hours away and in less than half an hour, Samira would be murdered. He could not have done it. 

Mr. Christiansen is positive about the time. He even walked the route again to time it, using his phone records which gave him the time that he had called his wife when he got home that day. He had passed the house sometime between 10:25 am and 10:45 am on February 22, 2014. He came forward and talked to law enforcement officials when he heard about Samira's death but this was the alibi that the prosecution chose to ignore. Even though Mr. Christiansen's story could be substantiated by a neighbour, Mr. Trip Frazee, that he stopped and talked to. 

And if that wasn't enough, the medical evidence showed that there was no pruning on Samira's fingers or toes. Pruning occurs within 30 minutes to an hour of a body going into water. With Dr. Frasch being three hours away, he could not have killed his wife. 





Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What's going on now? The fight for Hyrah and Skynnah

Image
A horrific drama continues to unfold in Tallahassee. Tallahassee lawyer James P. Waczewski has filed a civil lawsuit against Dr. Frasch on behalf of his client, Samira Frasch’s mother in Madagascar.  Samira Frasch’s mother wants not only the children but also Samira's $1 million dollar insurance settlement that would have gone directly to secondary beneficiary, Hyrah (Adam and Samira's firstborn), under the Slayer Statute which says a murderer can't financially benefit from his crime. But the  settlement  was paid to the primary beneficiary, Dr. Adam Frasch, before his trial. The insurance company did their own investigation and discovered many exonerating facts, including that one of Samira’s phones had pinged off of a tower in Marianna, FL at the time that Dr. Frasch was passing through on his way to Panama City Beach. Since his own phone showed him steadily heading south, they knew he was nowhere near his home in Tallahassee at the time of his wife’s death. And this is...
Read more

Scapegoat

Image
On February 22, 2014, Samira Frasch - supermodel, singer, mother - was alleged to be ‘found’ dead at the bottom of the pool of her Tallahassee, Florida home by a maintenance man. At the same time, her husband was in Panama City Beach (a three-hour drive away) with their two young children having left the house early that morning to give his wife a Momma’s Day Off.  It should have been a good day for Samira. Dr. Adam Frasch often took the children so that his wife could run errands, get her hair and nails done or go to the spa for a massage, waxing and facial. It was something they did when they were at home or travelling. Dr. Frasch would take the two girls to the park or library or Chuck E. Cheese. And as the girls got older, he would take them to the beach house. Sometimes Samira would meet them later in the day and take the kids so that her husband could get a massage or run some errands or if either of them wanted to use one of their sports cars or motorcycles that weren’t baby...
Read more

Trial

Image
What kind of relationship did they have? “Everything I can tell, it was pretty violent… physical abuse, verbal abuse, mental for sure.” Jason Newlin, State Attorney Investigator  Everything got twisted right from Day One. It was true that Dr. Frasch and his wife had a history of violence. But it was Samira who was the assailant. Because of a bipolar disorder, on occasion Samira would get violent, full of rage and out-of-control. Ninety-five percent of the time, the Fraschs were fine but these domestic incidents were used to support that they had a tumultuous relationship without ever mentioning that it was Samira who instigated them and Dr. Frasch who endured them.  Dr. Frasch challenges anyone - friend, family or foe - to name one time he was violent toward Samira. In fact, anyone who knew the family would have had to say that when Samira threatened him, her husband replied with patience and love. But no character witnesses were called on to oppose the picture of violence cre...
Read more